Critical Thinking (Part 2)

What does critically thinking involve? Though many other scholars have provided us with some insight on critical thinking, I will, very briefly, engage with the work of R. Paul, A. Binker, K. Jensen and H. Kreklau. In their work, Critical thinking handbook: A guide for remodeling lesson plans in language arts, social studies and science (1990), they have developed a list of thirty-five dimensions of critical thought. Here is a summary.

These writers conclude from their study that critical thinking involves affective and cognitive strategies. These strategies are useful, I believe, in helping us to strengthen our capacity to think critically. I will cursorily examine the affective dimension of critical thinking as presented by these scholars in this article.
 Affective strategies refer to the approaches which we may use to understand and keep in focus the emotional dimension of our thinking.

If we allow our emotions to cloud our thinking this will influence our conclusions which will, in turn, affect our decision making. Therefore, we should attempt to develop a number of skills to, as far as possible, keep our emotions at bay when we critically examine issues.
We should develop the skill of thinking independently. That is, we should learn to form our own opinions of issues after examining as much as possible of the available information on that issue. Second, we should be reflexive. We should study ourselves. We should question our motivations, our thoughts and our actions. Third, we should refrain from being judgemental. Instead, we should try to be fair. This is possible if we take into consideration all the “evidence” on the issue with which we are dealing. Fourth, we should develop the art of reasoning. That is, we must learn to analyse issues.

We have all heard people make statements which they do not substantiate with any evidence. Or, we have all, at times, made statements which we do not substantiate with any evidence. “It is my opinion,” we say with much belligerence when other more critical souls than we challenge our positions. Since it is our opinion, the statement should be unquestioned, we tell our challengers. But, we should not be unwilling to welcome challenges to our points of view. Neither should we be wary of entertaining other points of view  which are different from ours.

Part of being critical thinkers is the willingness to intellectually engage with issues even if they run counter to our accepted wisdoms. We do not have to accept/support them, if after we have critically examined them, we find them wanting.

It is all good that we have independent thoughts but we should ensure that we are not reflecting the biases of our social or other groups when we make statements. We should aim to be fair. Therefore, we should do more than a surface examination of our thoughts, motivations, influences and so on. We must learn the art of reasoning and hold back on our tendency to judge others.
Do we as teachers think critically about our students as we develop strategies to help them get the most from their schooling? Not all the time.

From my years of being a student and also being a teacher I have realised that some teachers have a tendency to negatively judge students. As one teacher puts it, some teachers tend to “look down" on students. For example, it seems that some teachers, no matter where on the socio-economic ladder they fall or have come from still equate students who come from poor circumstances with "dunceness" while those from privileged socio-economic positions they equate with "smartness".

However, “dunceness” and “smartness” run the gamut from poor students to rich students. It seems that most students who come from poor circumstances will remain in these circumstances throughout their lives as Derek Gordon, in his work on Class, Status and Social Mobility in Jamaica (1987) has shown us. This situation, however, is not as a result of any innate academic disability on the part of many of these students. This situation has arisen as a result of the persistent deprivation that has dogged successive generations.
As teachers, we need to develop the art of critical thinking. It is in mastering this art that we will truly be able to understand ourselves, students and others. After we have come to an understanding of self, students and others, then we will be able to make informed decisions on how to solve the problems in education that we face daily.

Read part 1 of this article.

 Read part 3 of this article.

 Read part 1 of this article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teachers: 6 ways to maintain a "good" relationship with your students

Image
Photo credit: pixabay.com You are in a noble profession, or so you've been told. Your job is very important. You are charged with moulding young and not so very young minds to accept and nurture what is "good" and so be a credit to society. Because, society needs "good" people if it is to surge upward in its development.  You're supposed to achieve this noble goal, in spite of whatever resistance/challenge that you meet in the classroom - students who are aggressive, disrespectful, resistant to learning what you are teaching them in the classroom... Some days the challenge of finding the right balance between allowing your students to be students, thus keeping them always happy, and getting them to perform up to the standard that you know they can perform weighs heavily on you. I have been a teacher for more than 25 years and I have survived many of these days. On one such day, I thought up this "tongue in cheek" list, intended to stir...
Read more

Improving School Leadership in Ten Easy Steps

Image
Robert Frost, late American poet aptly said,  "education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper or self-confidence". Recently, the news media in a society that will remain unnamed reported that a male school principal was in a fight with a female student. Witnesses, however, reported that there were actually no blows thrown by the principal, in spite of his best efforts to box the student into oblivion. It was a super human effort by those who restrained the principal to keep him in check, as for a moment, he let his mask slip - the mask of being a decent, educated man, in charge of his faculties and who weilded much power - and became the man that the environment in which he grew up moulded, a base human being like many of us who does not turn the other cheek in the face of provocation. It would seem that the student does not respect anyone or anything. She has a reputation for being unruly, foul mouthed, aggressive,  uncooperative...
Read more

The Magician, the Cheerleader, the Martyr and 7 others: Which one are you?

Image
‘The man is in the coffin,’ she muttered, staring into space.   ‘How do you feel today, Ms. Brown?’ the man asked. ‘The man is in the coffin,’ she replied. ‘What is your name?’ he asked. ‘The man is in the coffin,’ she repeated. ‘Ok. Can you write your name?’ he pressed her. ‘The man is in the coffin,’ she reiterated. Six words. She was left with only six words: ‘The man is in the coffin.’ When commentators are not satisfied with the quality of the work that teachers do in the classroom and the output of the education system generally, they tend to make the mistake of presenting teachers as a homogeneous mass.  'Teachers are not doing a good job,' they say. Or, 'teachers need to take the job of teaching more seriously than they do'. Or, 'teachers are the reason why students perform poorly in school'. The list of criticisms thrown at the teacher is long. What these commentators fail to highlight is the fact that teachers differ in many...
Read more