Bullying in schools – Members of Staff as Perpetrators


 
Much research has been done on bullying in schools. This research has mainly focused on students as perpetrators of bullying against each other. Some research, however, has also been done on bullying in organisations. Definitions of bullying focus on the actions and intent of the bully or bullies which are always negative. Definitions also focus on the repetitive nature of the negative actions perpetrated by the bully or bullies on their victims. The definitions of bullying also emphasise that bullying can be direct such as physical assault on the victims but it can also be indirect such as the spread of gossip.

Bullying is a form of intimidation of others by those who possess various types of “power”. This could be power in the form of physical strength; it may be power in the form of the possession of resources whether money, desirable group affiliations or any other desired resource. Acts of bullying are perpetrated for a number of reasons, some incomprehensible. But, oftentimes, the bully or bullies basically want to establish and or maintain their power position in the eyes of the bullied.

While much attention in the research has been focused on students bullying each other, I have not found any that specifically deals with the bullying of staff by other staff members in schools. Probably research exists on this issue and I leave those interested to go seek out the research. I am writing from my observation of this phenomenon in a number of schools.

Within the school, there is continuing interaction between and among staff occupying different roles in the school: interactions between and among principal and all levels of staff; interactions between and among members of faculty; interactions between and among members of faculty and administrative and ancillary staff. This interaction is vertical, horizontal and lateral and going in all directions.

It is fair to assume that if these interactions are cordial the morale of staff will be high. Therefore, staff will not mind going beyond the call of duty, if necessary. But if members of staff perceive that they are being victimised their morale will be negatively impacted which, in turn, may impact their commitment to the organisation. And this may, in turn, negatively impact the performance of the staff which may also negatively impact the performance of the organisation as a whole.

Anecdotal evidence of this bullying among staff in schools takes several forms. First, imagine a principal who forbids faculty from expressing opinions in staff meetings and expects them to listen and to do what they are told. This is an example of undemocratic leadership which escapes into bullying when the principal decides to redeploy members of faculty who defy him/her to teach in areas outside their competence. Or, the principal who consciously decides to overlook eminently qualified and responsible persons for promotion to senior positions as punishment for some perceived act of defiance that they had committed in the organisation. Or, the principal who has an aversion to the secretary which she has inherited and takes every opportunity to publicly vilify her.

Second, some members of faculty are also guilty of bullying. Oftentimes, these bullies are seemingly extroverts. They are loud and overbearing in their attitudes. They like to be in control. They want or have positions of leadership in the organisation. Those who have positions of leadership in the organisation take every opportunity to highlight to the public superficial weaknesses of those they lead. Others who do not yet lead but aspire to positions of leadership resort to gossip to malign the character of those they see as their main rivals. And, sometimes, both tactics - publicly humiliating others and gossiping  - are used by both groups, those who hold positions of leadership and those who aspire to positions of leadership to get their way.

These negative actions, taken by members of staff in schools against each other are examples of bullying – actions repeatedly taken to intimidate others in order to ensure that others are subject to their will so that they (bullies) can maintain or establish their position of unrivalled power in the organisation. These acts of bullying, among others, that some members of staff of schools resort to put pressure on the victims. This results in some members of staff being “forced” out of the organisation while others remain, too stressed by the bullying to be effective. Of course, not all victims remain passive. Some fight back. And this leaves the organisation in a constant state of war.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Teachers: 6 ways to maintain a "good" relationship with your students

Image
Photo credit: pixabay.com You are in a noble profession, or so you've been told. Your job is very important. You are charged with moulding young and not so very young minds to accept and nurture what is "good" and so be a credit to society. Because, society needs "good" people if it is to surge upward in its development.  You're supposed to achieve this noble goal, in spite of whatever resistance/challenge that you meet in the classroom - students who are aggressive, disrespectful, resistant to learning what you are teaching them in the classroom... Some days the challenge of finding the right balance between allowing your students to be students, thus keeping them always happy, and getting them to perform up to the standard that you know they can perform weighs heavily on you. I have been a teacher for more than 25 years and I have survived many of these days. On one such day, I thought up this "tongue in cheek" list, intended to stir...
Read more

Improving School Leadership in Ten Easy Steps

Image
Robert Frost, late American poet aptly said,  "education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper or self-confidence". Recently, the news media in a society that will remain unnamed reported that a male school principal was in a fight with a female student. Witnesses, however, reported that there were actually no blows thrown by the principal, in spite of his best efforts to box the student into oblivion. It was a super human effort by those who restrained the principal to keep him in check, as for a moment, he let his mask slip - the mask of being a decent, educated man, in charge of his faculties and who weilded much power - and became the man that the environment in which he grew up moulded, a base human being like many of us who does not turn the other cheek in the face of provocation. It would seem that the student does not respect anyone or anything. She has a reputation for being unruly, foul mouthed, aggressive,  uncooperative...
Read more

The Magician, the Cheerleader, the Martyr and 7 others: Which one are you?

Image
‘The man is in the coffin,’ she muttered, staring into space.   ‘How do you feel today, Ms. Brown?’ the man asked. ‘The man is in the coffin,’ she replied. ‘What is your name?’ he asked. ‘The man is in the coffin,’ she repeated. ‘Ok. Can you write your name?’ he pressed her. ‘The man is in the coffin,’ she reiterated. Six words. She was left with only six words: ‘The man is in the coffin.’ When commentators are not satisfied with the quality of the work that teachers do in the classroom and the output of the education system generally, they tend to make the mistake of presenting teachers as a homogeneous mass.  'Teachers are not doing a good job,' they say. Or, 'teachers need to take the job of teaching more seriously than they do'. Or, 'teachers are the reason why students perform poorly in school'. The list of criticisms thrown at the teacher is long. What these commentators fail to highlight is the fact that teachers differ in many...
Read more